Chapter 1: The Fallacy of the 10,000-Hour Rule

The notion that simply accumulating 10,000 hours of practice guarantees success is a myth. Merely showing up is no longer sufficient.

In 2009, I stumbled upon Malcolm Gladwell's idea of the 10,000-hour rule, which felt revolutionary at the time. I believed that all I needed for success was to invest that amount of time in deliberate practice. However, after a decade of writing, I’ve come to realize that this rule is fundamentally flawed.

Today, I had an intriguing conversation with a hopeful filmmaker. At 53, he has decided to pursue his passion, and I wholeheartedly support that. Even though my expertise is in content creation rather than film, I shared my thoughts. He mentioned his plan to release a seven-part series on TikTok, thinking this would catch the attention of film studios.

Initially, I shared his belief that having a small body of work would suffice for recognition. However, the sheer volume of content available today is overwhelming, and no one—individuals or corporations—can consume it all as they once did. Moreover, social media algorithms favor those who post consistently over those who rely on sporadic releases.

Our discussion then turned to the story of JK Rowling, where he argued that persistence would eventually lead to success if he kept seeking approval from industry gatekeepers. I cautioned him against romanticizing these success stories, stating, “Believing you’ll be that one in a million is as unlikely as winning the lottery.”

We concluded that steady, unexciting consistency is essential for success, even in filmmaking. I shared how many writers I know who have persevered beyond five years often achieve significant accomplishments, regardless of their initial talent.

Reflecting on this, I realized that the 10,000-hour rule isn’t the secret to success. From ages 12 to 26, I devoted countless hours to music—practicing drums and sound engineering for eight hours a day—but I never achieved my musical ambitions.

Later that evening, I encountered a young LinkedIn creator who, in just six months, built a vast audience and garnered millions of views. What set him apart? He doesn’t subscribe to the 10,000-hour doctrine; he rejects the idea of deliberate practice. Instead, he iterates rapidly on the challenges he faces, a skill honed from his engineering background at Google.

This ability to iterate is crucial, yet it often remains absent in other fields. In a typical career trajectory, individuals learn a skill, secure a job, and become complacent after their initial learning curve. I recall my first year in banking was overwhelming, filled with new systems and challenges. By the second year, many colleagues ceased to expand their knowledge base.

What I observed was a lack of iteration. They relied on the same approaches to solve the same problems, while technological advancements continued to evolve. My own journey diverged; I frequently switched jobs, continuously learning new skills in finance and beyond.

It's not that I'm particularly intelligent, but my eagerness to explore has led me to iterate more than most. This difference in mindset—between a fixed and a growth-oriented approach—allows for greater achievements.

What does this mean for you?

A crucial success strategy lies in focusing on 10,000 iterations rather than 10,000 hours. Repeating the same actions without evolving your mindset, skills, or networks seldom transforms ordinary individuals into extraordinary successes.

To truly embrace the 10,000-iteration philosophy, you must be open to facing rejection and failure. Analyze your results and make incremental adjustments more swiftly than you usually would. Prioritize daily changes over mere consistency.

The essence of the 10,000-iteration rule is execution; it’s through this focus that you gain insights leading to substantial and rapid progress. Time spent practicing alone does not ensure mastery. The 10,000-hour rule could well be one of the most significant obstacles to your success.

Adopt the 10,000 iterations principle. Aim for 10,000 iterations in the next five years, and you’ll significantly increase your chances of joining the elite ranks in your field.

Chapter 2: The Shift to Iteration

To further explore this revolutionary approach to success, check out the following videos:

The first video titled "The 10,000 Hour Rule is a Lie!" challenges the validity of the 10,000-hour rule, arguing that consistent iteration is the true key to success.

The second video, "Malcolm Gladwell Demystifies 10,000 Hours Rule," provides insights into why this popular belief may not hold true in today's fast-paced world.

Join my email list, which has over 181K engaged individuals, to learn the principles that will help you reach the top 1% in your domain.