# Should You Invest in a 'Lifetime' Software Membership?
Written on
Chapter 1: The Shift to Subscription Models
If you’re someone who enjoys experimenting with various software applications, you’ve likely noticed the growing trend towards software subscriptions. In the past, whether it was for Mac software or iOS apps, most of our favorite programs required just a one-time purchase. There was something satisfying about “owning” software after buying it. However, the landscape has shifted. To establish a more reliable revenue stream, many software developers have transitioned from one-time purchases to a subscription-based approach.
This article isn't meant to argue which model is superior, as that debate has been extensively discussed over recent years. Despite ongoing conversations, the rise of subscription-based software continues unabated.
Instead, this article will delve into a different question. While many software products are moving to a subscription format, some developers are still offering a ‘Lifetime’ purchase option alongside monthly and yearly subscriptions. Faced with this choice, what do you prefer? Are you comfortable with ongoing payments, or do you yearn for the satisfaction of a single, lasting purchase? How should you make an informed decision?
Section 1.1: The Illusion of Ownership
In my view, although various software companies provide a ‘Lifetime’ purchase option, it might be wiser to adapt and select the subscription model instead. Why is that?
Firstly, regarding the notion of product ownership, the ‘Lifetime’ licensing model is more of a fantasy than a reality. Various factors can disrupt your dream of owning software indefinitely. For instance, developers may cease to maintain the software, fail to update it for newer Mac systems, or even pivot to different software with similar functionalities. The development team might disband or the company could close its doors. Moreover, changes in Apple’s policies might make the software incompatible with their platforms or unavailable on the App Store. Lastly, if the software’s design becomes outdated compared to newer options, you may find yourself switching to a fresh alternative, leaving your purchased software unused and forgotten on your hard drive.
Section 1.2: Supporting Developers
From a developer’s standpoint, the subscription model tends to be more advantageous than the ‘Lifetime’ licensing approach. Subscriptions provide a steady, reliable income, which is crucial for the ongoing success of their businesses. This ensures consistent customer support and regular software updates. Conversely, the ‘Lifetime’ payment model, while offering a large upfront sum, might encourage developers to neglect established products and customer bases in pursuit of new ventures.
Subsection 1.2.1: The Cost Perspective
From a consumer angle, the cost associated with a ‘Lifetime’ license often equates to multiple years' worth of subscription fees, making it a less economical choice. A recent extreme case I came across in the Apple ecosystem is the software Infuse. Its ‘Lifetime’ purchase price is around $100, which is about ten times the annual subscription fee. This means that to justify a one-time purchase, I would need to use the software continuously for a decade just to break even. This calculation doesn't even account for the discounted cash flow from annual payments, which could extend the break-even point significantly. It’s truly astonishing.
Chapter 2: Conclusion
In summary, while the allure of a ‘Lifetime’ membership might be strong, the practical benefits of subscriptions often outweigh the fleeting satisfaction of ownership.