johnburnsonline.com

Understanding Taylor's Theorem: A Deep Dive into Function Approximations

Written on

Chapter 1: An Introduction to Taylor's Theorem

Taylor's Theorem allows us to estimate functions at points close to a given reference. While it might sound complex, it’s a fundamental concept in mathematics and physics.

I've delayed discussing this topic for quite some time. In my earlier writings, I've referenced an important result without delving deeply into it: Derivatives are assessed at a specific point, denoted as x. This is formally recognized as the Taylor series expansion of a function f(x) around that point. When ε is a tiny value, Taylor's Theorem asserts that the following approximation holds true:

This approximation is termed the Taylor approximation of order k, with the first-order case, known as the linear approximation, being particularly significant. The second-order approximation is also occasionally utilized, particularly in my previous discussions. When it comes to functions with multiple variables, the expansion becomes more intricate, so we will limit our focus to the second-order case for now.

While I won’t be proving Taylor's Theorem here—since that’s a straightforward exercise found in any standard calculus textbook, and duplicating it would likely bore you—I will instead highlight its relevance in the realm of physics and present two key applications.

The Importance of Taylor's Theorem

In physics, Taylor's Theorem is crucial when we need to express the value of a function at one point based on its value at a nearby point. Often, the linear approximation suffices, as we can assume a scale where the contributions of higher powers of ε are negligible.

For instance, if we know the value of f(x) at a certain point and have the first derivative f′(x), we can estimate f(x + ε) by drawing a line through the point (x, f(x)) that has a slope of f′(x). If we also know higher derivatives at x, we can refine our estimate of f(x + ε) using this additional information. The concept naturally extends to multiple variables, where we simply replace the tangent line with a tangent plane.

The tangent plane to the graph of f at point P provides an approximation for nearby points on that graph.

Taylor's Theorem also comes into play when we possess qualitative insights into how physical processes relate at adjacent points. This qualitative information can be mathematically expressed by linking it to the derivatives found in a Taylor expansion of the function describing the phenomenon in question.

For example, in my recent discussion, I explored the relationship between the velocities of two test particles in an infinitesimal parcel of fluid. The relevant empirical insight was that the motion of a parcel of incompressible Newtonian fluid comprises translation, rotation, and deformation components. By employing a linear approximation to relate the motion of one particle to that of another, I derived expressions for translation, rotation, and deformation.

Such scenarios are commonplace in both theoretical and experimental physics. Introductory courses often overlook Taylor approximations in favor of more straightforward problems with exact solutions, as these serve better educational purposes at that stage. There's an argument to be made that physics fundamentally involves the study of linearization as it applies to the natural world. Regardless of one's stance on this interpretation, a solid understanding of Taylor's Theorem is indispensable for physicists, and lacking this knowledge can hinder progress.

Example: The Multipole Expansion

Consider the scenario where we wish to analyze charge distribution within a material sample. To achieve this, we need to infer the distribution from its interaction with an electric potential. We assume complete knowledge of the applied potential, as we control the experimental parameters. Our approach will involve representing the unknown distribution as a superposition of elementary charge distributions, each of which interacts only with the nth-order terms in the Taylor expansion of the potential. This method is known as the multipole expansion.

Let ϕ denote the known potential, while ρ signifies the unknown charge density function within the sample. Let V represent the region occupied by the sample, which we assume is small and centered around the origin. The charges responsible for ϕ are located far from the sample.

The energy associated with the interaction between the two sets of charges can be expressed as the volume integral of ρϕ over V. We can formulate ϕ as a Taylor expansion around the origin, with ϕ₀ representing the potential at that point. Therefore, the potential at (x, y, z) within V is:

The subscript 0 on each derivative indicates evaluation at the origin.

The leading term in the total energy becomes:

The elementary distribution interacting with the zero-order term is a point charge located at the origin, with its value equivalent to the total charge of the sample. This point charge is referred to as the monopole, thus we designate Q as the monopole moment of the sample.

For the subsequent term, we simplify as follows:

Here, E₀ represents the electric field at the origin due to ϕ. The interaction energy for this component is given by:

The integral of ρr across the entire charge distribution is known as the dipole moment, denoted as p. Hence, the elementary distribution interacting with the first-order terms in the Taylor expansion of ϕ is a pure dipole with moment p. A pure electric dipole consists of two equal and opposite charges separated by a fixed distance. A nonzero dipole moment indicates a net separation of positive and negative charges along the line through the origin in the direction of vector p.

The video titled "Oxford Calculus: Taylor's Theorem Explained with Examples and Derivation" provides an insightful explanation of the theorem, showcasing its applications through various examples.

Next, we simplify the remaining terms by separating mixed partials, for instance:

To streamline our calculations, we replace 1/2 with 3/6. The rationale for this adjustment relates to the mathematical principles underlying multipole theory, which we cannot delve into here.

Given that no charges producing ϕ exist within V, it follows that ϕ satisfies Laplace's equation at the origin. This allows us to add any multiple of (∇²ϕ)₀ to the total sum of second derivatives without altering its value. Hence, we can add -(r²/6)(∇²ϕ)₀, where r² = x² + y² + z².

Let i and j be elements from the set of variables {x, y, z}, leading to the assignment:

The symbol δᵢⱼ is known as the Kronecker delta. For instance, if i = x and j = y, then αᵢⱼ = 3xy; if i = j = z, then αᵢⱼ = 3z² - r². The sum of second partials can be expressed as:

Now we calculate the energy integral for the second-order terms:

The integral of ραᵢⱼ across the charge distribution corresponds to the quadrupole moment, represented as a tensor in a 3×3 array with components Qᵢⱼ. The elementary distribution engaging with the second-order terms in the Taylor expansion of ϕ is a pure quadrupole, with its moment tensor defined by Qᵢⱼ. A pure quadrupole consists of two equal dipoles oriented in opposite directions. The quadrupole moment provides insights into how the distribution deviates from spherical symmetry.

Continuing this process would yield interaction energies for the octopole moment, 16-pole moment, 32-pole moment, etc. In practice, the interaction energies associated with higher-order multipole moments diminish rapidly with increasing order, allowing us to achieve a good approximation by truncating at the quadrupole moment.

Consequently, we can express the total interaction energy as:

The moments' values can be determined experimentally by observing changes in energy as ϕ varies, offering a method for analyzing the internal electrical structure of a material sample. This highlights the significance of multipole expansion theory in both molecular and atomic physics. For instance, to assess whether a substance possesses polar or non-polar molecules, one can test a sample to check for a dipole moment.

The video titled "Proof of Taylor's Theorem from Real Analysis" offers a rigorous proof of the theorem, further solidifying its foundational role in advanced mathematics.

Chapter 2: Conservation Laws and Symmetries

Noether's Theorem is a pivotal concept in theoretical physics, stating that if a system behaves consistently under a particular infinitesimal transformation, this transformation corresponds to a conserved quantity. We will demonstrate how translation symmetry results in conservation of momentum. To simplify, we will consider a conservative system.

Assuming a system comprises n particles located at positions (xᵢ, yᵢ, zᵢ), and the potential energy is a function of all particle positions, V(x₁,…, xₙ, Y, Z), where Y and Z represent shorthand for all y and z coordinates of the particles. If we translate every particle in the system by an infinitesimal distance ε in the x-direction, then the potential remains invariant: V([x₁+ε],…,[xₙ+ε],Y, Z) = V(x₁,…, xₙ,Y, Z). However, this invariance does not hold if only some particles are translated, particularly when potential energy is dependent on inter-particle distances.

We can perform a linear expansion:

From our assumption of translation symmetry, we derive:

For conservative systems, since F = -∇V, the sum of the x-components of the forces acting on each particle equals zero, indicating that the system experiences no net force in the x-direction. Since force is the time derivative of momentum, it follows that the x-component of the total momentum is conserved.

Concluding Thoughts

While approximation theorems may not carry much weight in basic physics courses, their significance increases dramatically as one progresses into advanced topics. Linear approximations, in particular, become integral to nearly every aspect of advanced physics, making it essential to grasp them thoroughly.

It’s worth noting that Taylor expansions can often be represented in various forms. To obtain the version utilized in this article, simply swap a with x and x with x + ε. The chosen form is largely a matter of notation, with one or the other being more beneficial depending on the specific problem at hand.

All images not originally created by me have been properly attributed. The fair use guidelines support the inclusion of these images for purposes such as educational discussion, news reporting, and critique.

Share the page:

Twitter Facebook Reddit LinkIn

-----------------------

Recent Post:

Exploring the Cosmic Dance of Existence

Delve into the profound reflections on existence and our place in the universe, illustrated through poetic imagery and thought-provoking questions.

Enhancing Your Python Code with Advanced Type Hints

Discover 9 advanced type hints in Python that enhance code readability and type safety.

Unlocking the Potential: Earn $30 for Just One Minute of Reading

Discover how to earn up to $30 for just one minute of reading on Medium and the strategies to attract inactive readers.

Navigating Friendship in the Digital Era: The Isolation Dilemma

Explore the paradox of digital connections and the effects of having no friends in today's tech-driven world.

The Future of Computation: Unveiling Strong Duality's Power

Explore how strong duality transforms computation and its implications for various fields.

The Airline with Advanced Missile Defense Systems

El Al Airlines employs cutting-edge anti-missile technology to ensure passenger safety against aerial threats.

Exciting Developments in Podcasting for 2024

A heartfelt reflection on podcasting's growth and challenges, along with hopes for a brighter 2024.

Exploring the Limitations of the C Programming Language

An in-depth look at the weaknesses of C programming language despite its power and utility in software development.